Monday 30 March 2015

Educating an Educator

Another course finished, another semester done and I’m left with a vast amount of new knowledge and approaches to twenty-first century learning. Indeed, one could *almost* say that through all the lectures, discussions, work, and assignments I’ve learned something myself. However, this knowledge did not come through any one source, but rather was curated from a variety of sources. There were the traditional, my professor, my classmates, and the less traditional, online educator blogs, my personal blogs, Pinterest and even the news.

At the beginning of the year we were tasked with following other educators and their online expeditions into navigating learning in the twenty-first century. I followed four blogs, admittedly more than the three we were meant to but for a reason. I approached this with the desire not only to learn more about twenty-first century learning but also to get a more global perspective on learning. I followed Canadian George Coruos’ The Principal of Change, American Larry Ferlazzo’s self-titled blog, as well as two blogs from the UK, one, Andrew Old’s Scenes from the Battleground - Teaching in British Schools, and the other, Thomas Starkey’s Stack of Marking, which follows, rather than public schools, experiences in a Further Education College, a blog I selected because of my interest in post-secondary teaching. As I followed the archives and new posts of each blog, it became clear that each had their own unique perspective on twenty-first century teaching, which has served to influence my understandings on teaching in the modern era. 

Couros’ blog demonstrates the fluidity of education with a focus on non-judgement for those focused on the “old story” but rather presents the appealing aspects of the “new story” education for those interested in adopting it. Perhaps this was best summarized in his March 10th post, “If you are scared of change ask yourself this question.” where in he states “People are terrified of change. Not just of change, but the process of change and what it entails”, recognizing not only the fear but also presenting the change, with each and every post. Larry Ferlazzo’s blog focused more on the way in which this innovation, once selected, is more than just a pick and choose scenario, presenting it and his work on the topic as a way of living, while still highlighting the issues with a sudden shift. I particularly enjoyed his March 25th post about the “YouTube Safety Mode” which integrated both his own troublesome experiences with the newly initiated program, as well as a recap of his Twitter interactions on the topic - directly showing how much twenty-first century learning can even help individuals understand the ins and outs of other twenty-first century educational assets. Arthur Old’s Scenes from the Battleground is an educational revelation which I’m incredibly happy to have found as it combines current events and educational politics, although from the United Kingdom, with in depth think pieces on debated issues in education. One such work was his “The Problem with Knowledge” presented in two parts which fought to understand the differences between traditional approaches to “knowledge” and challenging what actually qualifies as useful intellect in the twenty-first century, directly altering modern perceptions of educational value. The final blog I followed, Stack of Marking was a testament to the way in which education at any level can be challenged and discussed, particularly when surrounded by an engaging narrative. One of his archival posts “Failing” was of particularly interest as he notes that none of his students blamed him after lower GCSE results, but more than this, one quote in particular struck me. He states, “Shared responsibility is something we all feel when it comes to our students and their academic achievement. We revel in the successes. … It bolsters our sense of self worth, validates the job we do. If nothing more it’s an ego boost. Their success is ours. But that is the same for the failures too.”, a quotation striking for its honesty as well as for what it says about the full expanse of a teacher’s role, going beyond twenty-first century techniques but also illustrating the importance of empathy in twenty-first teaching.

However, just as much as these inspiring educators, I was also fascinated and educated by the art of curation on Pinterest and Cube for Teachers. While Cube is brilliant in it’s alignment with the Canadian curriculum, I plan on adding some of the resources I found on Pinterest onto my Cube account. Pinterest brought a great deal of teaching and technique down to a fun and innovative level that I had not seen before. I remember students around me struggling to grasp tenants of English, but would they have struggled seeing an (admittedly unacademic but nonetheless humorous and accurate) article like “Fancy Literary Techniques Explained by Disney”? Or an activity which used Pixar short films to explain and enhance plot? By bringing the most theoretical approaches, those which tend to confuse students, down to relatable things, however childish, Pinterest’s curatorial skills work in its favour and make it an invaluable resource.

All of this, in addition to classroom discussions of literacies and other twenty-first century ideologies, worked to influence my blog over these past few months, teaching me to write on what is topical, analyzing everything and more importantly, keeping my eyes open at all times. Education should be more than theory and learning, but innovation, studying the real and relevant and daring to incorporate and challenge existing structures. That is perhaps, the most powerful take away from this course. That one cannot be a passive learner - even once the classroom with you in the seat of the student is long gone. No, we must remain active, constantly working to improve ourselves and our classrooms and keep them relevant, both for our students and education in general.

Until next time,

A. Gallacher

Monday 16 March 2015

Looking Back ...

This week, as I embark on a project based on analyzing a curriculum project, I thought it would be good to focus on the structure of backwards design principles. Backwards design is described as an extension of integrative thinking, wherein the curriculum is analyzed and studied, beginning with the base work, but with the first structured piece of class that is planned being the final assessment, with lessons planned after this is already established (Drake, Ried, Kolohon, 2014, 58-93). Generally, it is believed that this process of unit building is forward thinking despite its backwards perspective. Indeed, having done projects and run throughs with backwards design of a unit, it is an incredibly effective way in which to organize and process the alignments of a unit. However, this has led me to wonder why, in a time of IEPs and personalization of teaching, this backwards design is still predominantly being applied to the teaching structure rather than the student. 

I’m by no means suggesting that backwards designing an entire education for every specific student is anywhere near a tangible possibility. Perhaps however, in a world where parents and students alike are requiring different approaches it could be adapted in a useful way. As has been in the news recently, this now even extends to curriculum, for example, with the new Ontario sexual education curriculum causing waves. If we must consider the need for accommodation, not only for exterior influences but also as a result of interior information based in the curriculum, how is this to be accommodated?

I suggest that perhaps, backwards design can be applied on a larger scale. If teachers were to consider a number of alternatively designed educational programs, having planned alternative learning backwards sourced from a number of the most common problems and complaints, teachers would be able to best address the issues while still maintaining common ground and a strong alignment.

The following video illustrates this backwards design:


As is said in this video, backwards design is all about helping the student to reach a “final destination” or goal in their educational landscape. Although there has been much controversy particularly recently with the release of the aforementioned sex education curriculum, perhaps, if teachers were to begin planning alternative assignments now for those students who may be withdrawn from classes or unable to complete specific segments, they may be able to create more common ground for removed students.

This may appear idealistic and, coming from someone with minimal classroom experience and a limited knowledge of the inner workings of such matters, it may well be. However, perhaps, in the field of education we are overlooking the best education we ourselves receive. We are taught to think ahead by thinking to the furthest point and working our way backwards. Perhaps if this were applied within the context of curriculum issues or classroom projects, IEPs could spread from a more fringe movement within the school community and be utilized to their fullest potential, to help the largest amounts of students possible at a given time, foreseeing future problems and attempting to accommodate rather than prevent. While I myself may not see any issues with curriculum as it stands, this does not mean others will react in the same way. As a prospective teacher, think it’s important that we start being proactive rather than reactive. I don’t doubt many are already, but perhaps this needs to be a movement, one which engulfs education for the better.

Reference List

Drake, S.M. & Reid, J.L. & Kolohon, W. (2014). Interweaving curriculum and classroom assessment: Engaging the 21 Century Learner. Toronto, ON: Oxford University Press. 

Monday 2 March 2015

Marketing Education?

Over the past week, we in our class were asked to explore modern twenty-first century schools and progressive education programs. While I was expecting these schools to follow in the footsteps of Summerhill School and provide global awareness and innovative approaches to education, I was interested to see the way in which many of these progressive institutions now structure themselves, not as fringe education but rather the education of the future. In studying schools like High Tech High, Galileo Educational Network, and Inquiry Hub, it becomes clear that the marketing between alternative and traditional schools differs greatly.

Take for example, Inquiry Hub, which proudly displays it's goals on its home page, aiming to "Connect/Create/Learn" as well as to connect all learning to "Identity, Stewardship, Communication and Design". However, where people initially balked at Summerhill, The Inquiry Hub, while it does not seem impervious to confusion and controversy, explains its standpoint, goals and overall mission directly on it's homepage. 

Perhaps this is key to understanding the rise in alternative education, perpetuated through marketing as well as education itself. By placing all of the information required on their landing page, Inquiry Hub has instantly overcome the majority of questions and uncertainty which would arise through it's unconventional exterior, working to make parents and students alike immediately comfortable and aware of the deviations from usual schooling. However, they also serve to justify these differences, utilizing upfront explanation to qualify their methods and circumvent confusion and additional concerns, by addressing them directly and immediately.

I think, more so than this sort of explanation serving to popularize specific minority curricula beliefs, it also serves to present how education is being marketed. When I approached these new schools, I was shocked by how much transparency there was in the landing pages, in additions to the webpages themselves. Which brings me to the question, why is it that there is such a level of differentiation in how “traditional” schools present themselves next to “alternative” schools? We rarely see the provincial educational web pages promoting themselves in this way, but what does this say about the traditionalism of the general school system?

While you may think this signals a rant into the lack of progressive content in the school systems available to most students, this is not my intent. Instead I suggest that schooling has become such an institution of society that it is believed we no longer need to “market” the classroom as we would a more unconventional classroom. However, we must remember that arguably the most important element of the classroom is engagement and must reflect constructively upon how this information behooves addition of new educational methods and reforms. Perhaps if schools were to implement webpages with this much description and context, educators would be able to eliminate a number of questions and offer a more transparent view of education. Indeed, perhaps this would even allow for teachers to introduce new and alternative methods of teaching while keeping students and parents aware and comfortable in an easy and accessible way, allowing for a greater level of comfort towards change in the traditional classroom.

Attached are links to Inquiry Hub and Summerhill's webpages so their landing pages can be explored.




Until next time!
A. Gallacher